A$AP Nast and Ganna Bogdan Show You How To Navigate the No-Rules Era of American Style

In the future, when the humanoids look back on America circa 2018 from the streamlined tidiness of their little sprocket colonies on Mars, they will surely think: LOL. What a shit show!

And also: What were they wearing?

Politically, socially, environmentally—the world is a mess right now, and we're all dressing for it. Fashion has always been a sign o' the times, and the sign currently has a blood-red “A” scrawled across it.

That's right: anarchy. Over the past ten years, men have dressed like preps and lumberjacks. Mad Men and stylish geezers. Even the athleisure movement had its moment. But now a new lawlessness has taken hold of our wardrobes—even here at the GQ offices. Just today I passed one colleague wearing gray sweatpants and another wearing spit-polished Calvin Klein cowboy boots. I'm wearing a tailored suit—but with a T-shirt that's been screenprinted with hallucinogenic mushrooms and tie-dyed. And somehow none of us have been cited by HR.

This chaos in clothing isn't just a street-level trend, either. Designers are on the same gonzo wavelength. The Gucci collections seem concocted by an Italian painter whose evening vin santo got spiked with mescaline and Viagra. Balenciaga looks like the genius brainchild of the forklift-driving manager at a Zappos warehouse. And those are the two hottest fashion houses on earth. (Go figure.)

On him: Polo, $98, by Lacoste. Cardigan, vintage. Shorts, $525, by Bally. Sneakers, $175, by New Balance x KITH. Jewelry, his own. On her: Blazer and shoes by Gabriela Hearst. Pants by Dickies. Glasses by Moscot.
On him: Polo, $98, by Lacoste. Cardigan, vintage. Shorts, $525, by Bally. Sneakers, $175, by New Balance x KITH. Jewelry, his own. On her: Blazer and shoes by Gabriela Hearst. Pants by Dickies. Glasses by Moscot.
On him: Shirt, $398, by Cobra. Coat, $2,195, and pants, $495, by Boss. Sneakers, $145, by Nike x KITH. On her: Tank by James Perse. Blazer and pants (men's) by Gucci. Sneakers and glasses, her own.
On him: Shirt, $398, by Cobra. Coat, $2,195, and pants, $495, by Boss. Sneakers, $145, by Nike x KITH. On her: Tank by James Perse. Blazer and pants (men's) by Gucci. Sneakers and glasses, her own.

Naturally, certain people are poised to shine in this messy fashion moment, like the rapper A$AP Nast and model Ganna Bogdan, who have cult followings on Instagram thanks to their uncanny ability to smash together different genres of clothing: a little midcentury tailoring mixed with some shagadelic '70s sportswear, topped off with a dash of '90s athletic gear. In the no-rules era, these two are in complete command.

So what does this mean for you? Well, you can follow your own sartorial muse, no questions asked. Feel like putting on a bolo tie instead of a bow tie at your best friend's wedding? Go for it.

It also means a wide range of contradictory things are in style at the same time. For example: When I started working at GQ back in 2007, we were trying to get every man in America to wear slim-fit plain-front pants. Full stop. But now you can wear baggy double-pleated cords on a Monday, skinny black jeans on a Tuesday, and high-waisted Fred Astaire trousers on a Wednesday.

On him: Jacket, $1,950, by Bottega Veneta. Pants, $630, by Marni. Sneakers, $175, by New Balance x KITH. Glasses, $940, by Tom Ford. Jewelry, his own. On her: Sweater-vest (men's) by Dries Van Noten. Sweater and pants, vintage. Shoes by A.P.C.
On him: Jacket, $1,950, by Bottega Veneta. Pants, $630, by Marni. Sneakers, $175, by New Balance x KITH. Glasses, $940, by Tom Ford. Jewelry, his own. On her: Sweater-vest (men's) by Dries Van Noten. Sweater and pants, vintage. Shoes by A.P.C.

The important thing to remember is that when you resist anarchy, it feels terrifying and chaotic. But when you embrace it, it feels like total freedom. So let's all swan-dive into this unruly and change-tastic new era.

Hey, if the world ends, at least we'll look the part.

Will Welch is GQ’s Creative Director

This story appears in the March 2018 issue of GQ with the title “Welcome to the No-Rules Era of American Style.”


Watch Now:

A$AP Ferg Doesn't Need to Write Anything Down Anymore

See the video.

<cite class="credit">John Hedgecoe/topfoto/the Image Works; Courtesy of Noah</cite>
John Hedgecoe/topfoto/the Image Works; Courtesy of Noah

Bite This Style

David Hockney’s Rebellious Legacy

In 1964, David Hockney followed the sun to Los Angeles. That's where his paintings and wardrobe began to share a palette: a jungle of verdant greens, pool blues, and vivid pastels. His color combos were so striking that you'd think he invented stripes. And this rugby from downtown N.Y.C. brand Noah passes the Hockney test: Would he have worn it in his heyday? We'd put money on it. In fact, he'd probably rock it today—he's still a fashion freethinker at 80.
—Samuel Hine


<cite class="credit">Mark R. Milan/gc Images/getty Images; Estrop/getty Images; Neilson Barnard/getty Images</cite>
Mark R. Milan/gc Images/getty Images; Estrop/getty Images; Neilson Barnard/getty Images

A Trend Explained

In Defense of the Uselessly Long Belt

Historically, the statement belt was best left to the likes of punks (black with silver studs) and Las Vegas hoteliers (alligator)—meaning a belt that got noticed was not such a good idea. But then suits became optional. Pants got baggy, and sweatpants got skinny. Sneakers got everywhere, and then they got ugly—on purpose. And belts? Belts got long. Unreasonably long, in some cases: the webbed army-surplus belt of your childhood. Streetwear wizard Virgil Abloh turned an industrial-yellow ratchet strap (the kind that's six feet long and secures cargo to truck beds) into a must-have accessory. I picked up my own too long D-ring belt, complete with an extra foot of leather that slaps against my leg as I walk. It doesn't match my shoes, and it's glaring when worn with a suit. It's too long for no good reason, which is exactly why I love wearing it.
—Sam Schube