Judges dubious toward Trump bid to suppress U.S. Capitol riot records

·4 min read

By Jan Wolfe

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. appeals court judges on Tuesday signaled skepticism toward former President Donald Trump's bid to keep records about his conversations and actions before and during the deadly Jan. 6 Capitol riot by a mob of his supporters away from congressional investigators.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard a three-hour oral argument in Trump's appeal of a judge's decision that the records should be turned over to a House of Representatives committee.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned why Trump should be able to challenge and overrule President Joe Biden's determination that the records should be handed over.

"Is there a circumstance where the former president ever gets to make this sort of call?" asked Jackson, seen as a possible future Supreme Court nominee for Biden.

Trump lawyer Justin Clark argued that a 1978 law called the Presidential Records Act gives Trump that power.

"I don't see that in the statute," Jackson responded.

The House select committee investigating the riot has asked the National Archives, the U.S. agency housing Trump's White House records, to produce visitor logs, phone records and written communications between his advisers. The panel has said it needs the records to understand any role Trump may have played in fomenting the violence.

Judge Patricia Millett also asked why a former president's determination should overrule one by the current president.

"We only have one president at a time under our Constitution," Millett said.

The three judges pressed Clark and another Trump lawyer, Jesse Binnall, over whether courts even have jurisdiction to hear the Republican former president's claims.

"All three branches of government have acknowledged there is a right of former presidents to challenge the designation and release of presidential records," Binnall responded.

Trump sued the committee and the National Archives to try to prevent the release. In court filings, Trump's lawyers called the Democratic-led investigation politically motivated, and argued that the requested documents are protected by executive privilege https://www.reuters.com/world/us/can-trump-use-executive-privilege-block-jan-6-attack-probe-2021-09-09, a legal doctrine that lets presidents keep private some of their conversations with advisers.

During Tuesday's hearing, Judge Robert Wilkins said Trump is not entitled to the type of document-by-document review he has requested before any records are released.

"It seems to me that your argument is inconsistent with our precedent," Wilkins told Clark.

Trump supporters stormed the Capitol in a bid to prevent Congress from formally certifying his 2020 presidential election loss to Biden. Shortly before the riot, Trump gave a speech to his supporters repeating his false claims that the election was stolen from him through widespread voting fraud and urging them to go to the Capitol and "fight like hell" to "stop the steal."

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Nov. 9 rejected https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-denies-trump-bid-block-jan-6-select-committee-investigation-2021-11-09 Trump's arguments, saying he had not acknowledged the "deference owed" to Biden's determination that the committee could access the records and adding: "Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President."

Trump's lawyers told the hearing they would consider appealing an unfavorable ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. They asked that any ruling against them not go into effect immediately so they could seek further review.

The D.C. Circuit put off allowing the committee to access the records while the three judges consider the matter. Jackson, Millett and Wilkins all were appointed by either Biden or former President Barack Obama, both Democrats.

Trump has urged his associates to stonewall the committee. His former chief strategist Steve Bannon already has been charged with contempt of Congress for defying the panel, pleading not guilty https://www.reuters.com/world/us/former-trump-adviser-bannon-enters-plea-not-guilty-obstructing-jan-6-2021-11-17. Trump's former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows has begun cooperating https://www.reuters.com/world/us/former-trump-chief-staff-meadows-agrees-cooperate-with-jan-6-panel-2021-11-30 with the committee, its chairman said on Tuesday.

(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Will Dunham and Scott Malone)

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting