Paul Haggis Rape Accuser’s Testimony Ends Abruptly After Five Hours On Stand; New York Trial To Resume Monday – Update

UPDATED: Almost five hours into a cross examination Friday that went second by second, and sometimes foot by foot, through the confines of Paul Haggis’ apartment where Haleigh Breest said she was raped by the writer-director in 2013, she became visibly upset enough that the judge, Sabrina Kraus, called a recess shortly after 4 p.m. — and then an early end to the day’s testimony in the sexual misconduct civil trial in Manhattan.

Breest, who walked out of the courtroom at the break, did not return.

More from Deadline

Related Story

Paul Haggis Accuser Testifies About Details of Alleged Rape: “I Was Like A Trapped Animal"

Related Story

Danny Masterson Rape Trial Sees Jane Doe #1 And Defense Spar Over NDA Payout, More – Update

Related Story

Paul Haggis Sexual Assault Civil Trial Opens With Both Sides Quoting Texts From Accuser

Breest became distressed as she was being asked by a lawyer for Haggis to demonstrate how she “squirmed” to avoid Haggis attempting to perform oral sex on her. She stood, tentatively hopped backward with her hands at her side. Then she looked across the courtroom, briefly tilted her head back, and said something barely audible about being “startled” or “scared” by the sight of a news photographer who had been in the courtroom all day documenting the proceedings.

Breest waved a hand in the photographer’s direction and slumped back into the witness chair, looking anguished, before rising with her arms tightly folded to watch jurors be excused for the break.

Kraus conferred for several minutes with the lawyers, and brought the jurors back in 15 minutes later to thank them and send them home for the weekend. The trial resumes Monday morning.

Breest was questioned for almost three hours before lunch, and then for just under two more hours, by Priya Chaudhry, who required Breest to go through the night of January 31, 2013 at Haggis’ apartment, where she alleges the incident occurred, in granular detail: her position on the bed in his guest room when he pulled her clothing off and then forced her to perform oral sex on him; her route through the multi-room Soho apartment when she tried to buy time and make an escape by taking a shower; the temperature of the water; and her position by the bed when Haggis later stepped into the shower and guided her back to the guest room for more sex.

“How many inches between your feet when you’re standing there?” Chaudhry asked. Breest said her feet were three inches apart when Haggis, crouching down, leaned his face toward her body. “I was squirming” to avoid the contact, she said. That’s when Chaudhry asked her to show how.

Before then, Breest said under cross-examination that she didn’t look for an exit beyond the private elevator that opened onto a small foyer, didn’t open a window and scream for help, didn’t grab a kitchen knife, didn’t lock herself in a bathroom or at any point tell Haggis she wanted out.

“There’s no discussion about you leaving, right?” Chaudhry asked.

“No,” Breest said.

She said that when Haggis demanded oral sex, she asked if he had a condom, and he produced one. “It was the best of all bad options,” she said — a remark the judge ordered jurors to ignore. But she couldn’t remember where he retrieved it, or how exactly he unwrapped it, or where it landed after he peeled it off and the oral sex continued unprotected. She said she left the bedroom for the shower without her clothes because everything was happening “fast.”

She also agreed there was no mention of a condom in any of the three complaints — the original one and two amendment complaints — where she detailed her allegations in seeking a lawsuit.

As with the Kevin Spacey trial, jurors saw a floor plan of the apartment where the assault allegedly occurred. Standing in front of a poster board sized blow-up, Breest used different colored markers to draw the places where she had stood, laid and walked.

Outside the courtroom, a lawyer for Breest, Ilann M. Maazel, called the cross-examination “glacial,” and “utterly ineffective but still appalling.”

Breest will not return to the stand right away Monday morning. Her lawyers said that one of four women they plan to call to testify about being abused by the Oscar-winning screenwriter, producer and director is flying in on Monday, the only day she has available to appear in court.

PREVIOUSLY, 11:43 AM: Haleigh Breest, the woman accusing Oscar-winning Crash director Paul Haggis of raping her in 2013, finished her direct testimony Friday with a last round of friendly questioning from one of her lawyers, Zoe Salzman — and then faced a more combative interrogation lasting almost three hours without a break.

A Haggis lawyer, Priya Chaudhry, confronted Breest about her sex life, drinking, prescription drug use and her actions on the night she went to Haggis’ apartment in Manhattan.

As a six-person jury of three men and three women looked on, with three alternates also seated, Chaudhry walked Breest through her earlier testimony in the sexual assault civil trial in New York. Under a cross-examination that sometimes turned sharp, Breest, a freelance film publicist at the time, said she went willingly to the moviemaker’s apartment following a film screening after-party that she had helped to organize and run, and drank wine with him after she had been drinking at the party.

In testimony steered by questions from Chaudhry, with Breest often straining at being limited to yes or no answers, she said she stayed in the apartment even after Haggis had kissed her without warning. “He slobbered over my face,” she testified, with Chaudhry pushing back, “Yes or no, did he kiss you for a few seconds?” “Yes,” Breest replied.

She said that as they drank wine in the kitchen, Haggis suddenly backed her up against a refrigerator and said, “You’re scared of me, aren’t you?” He also asked her age, and when she said 26, he replied, “Don’t act like a f*cking 18-year-old.”

She said she really was scared — “I was so scared and embarrassed” — but answered “no” to his question, which she said on cross-examination wasn’t true. She put on a “front,” she said, with a man she has previously described as a friend of her boss at the movie events company. She made no effort to collect the shoes and tote bag she had dropped in the kitchen, close to a hallway leading to a private elevator to the lobby, and she accepted a tour of the apartment that ended in the guest bedroom, where she said the rape took place.

“Mr. Haggis did not force you into that room, did he?” Chaudhry asked.

“No,” Breest said.

Breest said Haggis pushed her on to the guest bed, and during a struggle got her tights, dress and sweater off. “But during the struggle you never once kicked him, is that right?” Chaudhry said.

“Correct,” Breest said.

She said Haggis, kneeling on the bed, then took off his own clothes.

“You’re just sitting there naked on the bed watching Mr. Haggis take his shirt off?” Chaudry asked. Breest called that a “mischaracterization.”

The three-hour exchange ended shortly after that, and will resume after jurors return from lunch.

The trial got underway in a Manhattan courtroom this week with graphic testimony over three days from Breest. Describing the assault, she said, “I was like a trapped animal,” she told jurors Thursday.

Breest went public with her rape claim in 2017 amid a flurry of news reporting about film producer Harvey Weinstein serially sexually abusing women. Those revelations spawned a movement and a hashtag, #MeToo, encouraging victims to come forward with their experiences of sexual violence at the hands of powerful — and seemingly untouchable — men.

Breest has said that she decided to finally speak up four years after the assault when she heard Haggis condemn Weinstein. “The hypocrisy of it made her blood boil,” Salzman told the court.

As Breest testified Thursday, jurors in a federal courthouse around the corner were reaching a quick verdict in another high-profile sexual misconduct case involving a major film industry figure, and a story of a traumatic encounter in a New York apartment — but decades earlier — that also blew up in the year of #MeToo.

That jury ruled that Anthony Rapp had failed to prove his claim that in 1986, when he was 14, a 26-year-old Kevin Spacey tried to coerce him into sex. The original #MeToo moment has reverberated through a handful of trials pitting accusers against well-known men.

Spacey, like Haggis, is facing multiple accusers. Breest’s lawyers say they plan to call as many as four other women who will claim they, too, were victims of Haggis.

Haggis has said the sex with Breest was consensual and in opening arguments his lawyers pointed to texts Breest sent a friend and co-worker that described the sex as “rough and aggressive” but didn’t characterize it as rape. Salzman, in opening arguments, read the same text exchange, in which Breest also wrote, “Never, ever again … And I kept saying no.”

Haggis has also argued that Breest could be a cat’s paw for the Church of Scientology, which Haggis belonged to before quitting and publicly criticizing the organization —  known for the celebrities in its ranks and for its willingness to sue critics — as a “cult.”

The last leg of direct questioning from Breest’s lawyer addressed this point.

“Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Church of Scientology” Salzman asked.

“No,” said Breest, adding that she has no family members in the organization, and has never attended any Scientology events.

“Has Scientology provided you with any kind of support whatsoever in this case?” Salzman asked. Breest said no, explaining that hers is a contingency fee arrangement in which her lawyers only get paid a portion of any judgement she might receive if jurors find Haggis liable and award her money.

Best of Deadline

Sign up for Deadline's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Click here to read the full article.