Overseas aid cut will not be restored in ‘foreseeable future’, Foreign Secretary admits

Rob Merrick
·2 min read
 (AFP via Getty Images)
(AFP via Getty Images)

The controversial £4bn-a-year cut to overseas aid will not be restored in “the foreseeable future”, the Foreign Secretary has admitted.

The reduction – from 0.7 per cent to 0.5 per cent of national income – has been described as “temporary”, but Dominic Raab told MPs it would not be reversed soon, because of the economic crisis.

The admission came as he provoked anger in the Commons by accusing critics of wanting to cut spending from hospitals and schools, or the fight against Covid-19 pandemic, instead.

One senior Tory demanded “a sunset clause in black and white”, to ensure the government does not backslide on the claim it will be “temporary”.

And Andrew Mitchell, the former International Development Secretary, accused Mr Raab of overseeing “a dismal start to our G7 premiership”, starting in January.

He warned that family planning would be swiped from 7 million people, “with all the misery that that will entail”, 2 million children would suffer malnutrition and 1 million girls “will not be able to go to school”.

“These reductions make little difference to us in the United Kingdom, but they make a massive difference to them,” Mr Mitchell warned.

Mr Raab confirmed the cut would require legislation – allowing Tory rebels to try to defeat it, probably in January – because of fears it would be overturned in the courts otherwise.

He acknowledged he could not “see a path forward back to 0.7 in the foreseeable or immediate future”, insisting it would depend on future “fiscal circumstances”.

Tom Tugendhat, the influential Conservative chair of the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, demanded the sunset clause, telling Mr Raab: “Does he understand why so many of us are disappointed?”

Anthony Mangnall, a backbench Tory MP, said he was “horrified” by the cuts, while Hilary Benn, a former Labour International Development Secretary, branded it “unforgivable”.

However, Mr Raab did appear to dump a plan to change the global definition of aid, which would have allowed cash to be diverted to items such as new cyberweapons and AI-enabled drones.

“We will remain committed to following the rules set by the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee,” he said, in a move that will disappoint some Conservative MPs.

It is unclear how much aid will be cut in 20210 – because the 0.5 per cent proportion of gross national income (GNI) depends on the size of the economy – but it expected to be around £4bn.

Stephanie Draper, chief executive of Bond, the network for aid organisations, said: “Aid had already been cut as GNI fell, and thousands more lives will now be lost.

“If the government manages to get the proposed changes to the Act through parliament, at a minimum, they should include a sunset clause that would return the 0.7 per cent commitment automatically – rather than continuing to play politics with the aid budget.”

Read More

Rishi Sunak accused of playing ‘divide and rule’ with pay freeze

99% of England to go into highest tiers after lockdown lifted - follow

Which lockdown tier am I in?

Will I be able to see my family at Christmas?

What are the new tier rules after lockdown?