Jobs data suggest states that cut off enhanced unemployment benefits did not boost rehiring
Several states ended pandemic-related enhanced federal unemployment benefits early this year over concerns that the extra $300 per week was preventing people from re-entering the workforce. But data from human resource software company Homebase, which CNBC economics reporter Steve Liesman says has provided good information during the pandemic, suggest that eliminating the benefits didn't contribute to re-hiring.
In fact, Homebase found the states that did so actually saw a slight decline in employment, while states that didn't lift the benefits saw 2.3 percent job growth. Critics argue this shows that cutting off the aid "hampers the recovery." Liesman isn't sure about that — he said he doubts there's a negative correlation between benefits elimination and job growth — but he isn't surprised it didn't boost hiring. Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal added that Homebase's data is just the latest evidence that shows ending unemployment insurance expansion didn't lead to "any kind of employment boon."
2/ “States that announced an early end of these benefits saw employment decline 0.9%, compared to 2.3% growth for states that did not lift benefits early.” I doubt there’s a negative correlation with ending benefits and jobs but not surprised there isn’t a strongly positive one.
— Steve Liesman (@steveliesman) August 4, 2021
You may also like
Why Tom Brady's 'gentle' roast of Trump at Biden's White House was actually 'deeply vicious'
Israeli data suggest infected, vaccinated individuals have low chance of spreading COVID-19
Arkansas governor admits he regrets signing mask mandate ban into law