Yahoo Movies Retirees: Ditch These 5 Pricey American Cities and Retire Here Instead
As people get closer to retirement, they tend to dream about where they might live out their golden years. They might even scout out a few locations in preparation. However, when faced with the financial realities of what it would take each year to actually live in a popular retirement destination, those pleasant dreams sometimes falter.
Social Security: Proposal for $2,400 Extra in Checks Expanded and Reintroduced in Congress
More: 3 Ways To Recession-Proof Your Retirement
If popular and pricey retirement towns like Miami, Denver and Los Angeles aren't in your budget, here are five affordable alternatives to consider.
Hialeah, Florida (Instead of Miami, Florida)
Miami may seem like a quintessential retirement destination -- with its warm weather and beautiful beaches -- but only if you have millions in the bank to foot the cost of living there throughout the years.
An affordable alternative is Hialeah, Florida, which is a mere 25-minute drive from Miami. Housing is 5% below the national average there and expenses like utilities and goods and services are within 2-3% of the national average.
See: 10 States To Avoid If You're Living on Just a Social Security Check
More: Dave Ramsey Says 401(k)s Have a Big Tax Downside - Pick This Retirement Plan Instead
Spokane, Washington (Instead of Portland, Oregon)
Portland has a lot to offer retirees, including abundant access to natural areas and an amazingly diverse culinary scene, but having to part with six figures each year to live there is hard on the wallet.
Luckily, Spokane, Washington is a good alternative. It has an impressive foodie scene as well, and is less than a 40-minute drive from Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, which is a recreational paradise. Housing in Spokane is 15% below the national average and groceries and utilities are within 2-3% of the national average.
Read More: 6 Types of Retirement Income That Aren't Taxable
Lamar, Colorado (Instead of Denver, Colorado)
There's no doubt that Denver is full of mountain views and beautiful scenery, but you would need a six-figure annual income to live here comfortably as a retiree. Lamar, Colorado, located in the southeastern part of the state, is an alternative that's a lot more affordable.
While it doesn't have the majestic mountain scenery that Denver does, it is considered one of the state's best birding destinations. This rural town is more than a three-hour drive from Denver, so you likely won't be going there on a whim. However, the cost of housing in Lamar is 50% below the national average and groceries, utilities and healthcare are also below.
Lancaster, California (Instead of Los Angeles, California)
Los Angeles has its strong points for retirees, including great weather and some of the best hospitals in the nation, but its cost of living is high. To live comfortably as a homeowner, you'd need around $150,000 at your disposal annually.
Instead, consider retiring in Lancaster, which is on the northern end of Los Angeles County, and only about an hour or so from Los Angeles. Although many of the cost-of-living expenses are similar to L.A.'s, you can save big on housing here. For example, housing in L.A. is 127% above the national average, whereas in Lancaster, it's only 5% above.
Scranton, Pennsylvania (Instead of New York City, New York)
If you have an affinity for New York and would love to make it your retirement home, it's not a bad idea. After all, you wouldn't need a car. Unfortunately, the Big Apple also made GOBankingRates' list of the most expensive cities in the U.S. to retire, so you'd have to have pretty deep pockets.
Instead, consider Scranton, Pennsylvania, which is within two hours driving distance of NYC. The typical home value in Scranton is $153,421, according to Zillow, which is 38% lower than the national average. Healthcare is also 15% lower than the national average.
More From GOBankingRates
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Retirees: Ditch These 5 Pricey American Cities and Retire Here Instead
